Yakir's Blog

Rough Polished Ideas Daily

The Sculptor’s Approach to AI Interaction

Within every AI model lies a universe of potential responses, waiting silently like forms trapped in marble.

The art of sculpture offers a compelling metaphor for how we might understand AI interaction. When a sculptor approaches a block of stone, they work with its inherent properties, revealing what possibilities exist within its structure. Similarly, our prompts to AI systems can be viewed as careful, deliberate strokes that uncover what mathematically exists within the model. The responses aren’t created from nothing but revealed from a vast landscape of statistical patterns and possibilities that were present all along, waiting to be accessed through the right combination of words.

This sculptor’s framing offers a fresh understanding of AI interaction. When we prompt these systems, we navigate through a forest of potential completions. Our words serve as guides through this labyrinth, illuminating certain branches while leaving others in darkness. The artistry lives in developing an intuition for which words will unveil the most beautiful, useful pathways among countless alternatives. Skilled prompting resembles skilled sculpting. Both require an understanding of what lies beneath the surface, and both demand knowing precisely where to apply pressure and angle the tools of our language.

What might change in your approach if you viewed each AI interaction as revealing rather than constructing? How would your prompts evolve if you imagined them as gentle tools uncovering pre-existing possibilities? Which prompting techniques might help you better sense the shapes waiting within the probabilistic stone? When you next encounter unexpected output, consider what this reveals about both the material itself and your sculpting technique. Was your chisel too blunt, your angle too steep, or have you perhaps uncovered an interesting vein in the material worth following further?

Your Value Rises As You Master Ambiguity

In most workplaces stands an invisible ladder few recognize. We climb rungs defined not by titles or tenure, but by how much ambiguity we can productively navigate. The higher you ascend, the more shapeless the challenges become and the more valuable your contribution.

This ladder of abstraction explains why two people with identical technical skills deliver radically different value. The junior employee waits for well-defined problems and solutions, requiring only implementation instructions. Meanwhile, someone operating three levels higher explores uncharted territory with only the vaguest destination coordinates, identifying which problems even deserve attention. The difference is perspective, not knowledge. The ability to see structure within chaos separates those who execute from those who transform.

I’ve noticed this pattern when collaborating with consultants. Some require meticulously detailed briefs while others need only alignment on outcomes. The latter cost more upfront but paradoxically save resources by solving problems I hadn’t yet recognized. They’ve trained themselves to spot dormant issues before they awaken, creating value from seemingly nothing. This feels connected to why we instinctively trust some colleagues with ambiguous assignments while micromanaging others.

What level of abstraction characterizes your daily work? Notice where you feel comfort versus resistance. The uncomfortable space just beyond your current level contains your most valuable growth. The place where you’ll feel most stretched but ultimately develop capabilities others can’t easily replicate. The most profound mindset transitions can happen when we deliberately climb to the next level of abstraction.

The Invisible Weight of Cognitive Load

Your mind has a surprisingly strict capacity. Not infinite. Not even close. Research consistently shows our brain’s working memory can only juggle a handful of distinct pieces of information simultaneously. Beyond this threshold lies cognitive overload, where comprehension crumbles and frustration builds.

You’ve experienced this limitation countless times. That moment when someone interrupts you mid-thought and you completely lose your train of thinking. When you walk into a room and forget why you entered. When you’re introduced to several people at once and immediately forget most names.

I unwittingly tested this principle when creating two different projects. The first involved dozens of small, interconnected components requiring constant mental reference to one another. Returning to it after months away felt impossible. It was like trying to hold water in cupped hands. The second project used fewer, more comprehensive modules. Despite almost equal complexity, I could immediately grasp its organization, because no single part required tracking too many connections at once.

What we design, be it software, schedules, or systems, either respects or ignores this cognitive limitation. The most elegant solutions aren’t those with fewer total parts, but those requiring fewer parts held in mind simultaneously.

Look at what’s overwhelming you today. The solution isn’t “try harder to remember.” It’s redesigning the task to require less simultaneous remembering. Transfer what’s in your limited working memory to external systems. Write things down. Create checklists. Combine related items into meaningful groups. Break complex sequences into distinct stages.

A repeating struggle with the same process is a design problem waiting to be solved. Redesign it to require fewer simultaneous mental connections. This is the essence of good UX design. And perhaps most importantly, protect your peak thinking hours from interruptions for complex work, acknowledging that your cognitive resources are precious rather than infinite.

Pick just one overwhelmingly complex task today and restructure it to demand less from your working memory. What system in your life is asking too much of your perfectly normal human brain?

Map The Hidden Gaps in Your Education

We know that schools mostly don’t prepare you for real independence. Teachers told you that you needed to learn algebra because “you won’t always have a calculator in your pocket”? Well, now we all carry supercomputers everywhere, yet we still struggle with basic life skills no one taught us. Cough. Taxes. Cough.

Education felt like training for a world that doesn’t actually exist. Memorizing arbitrary facts for tests but not learning how to manage finances?! We practiced, ad nauseam, sitting quietly but not how to collaborate effectively. We were drilled into following instructions but not shown how to identify which problems are worth solving in the first place.

This disconnect isn’t accidental. Our education system evolved from the Prussian model designed to create compliant workers and soldiers. While content has updated over centuries, the underlying structure remains remarkably similar: creating predictable, obedient participants for the economy. I’m not being dramatic. Just look at how we treat creative children who can’t sit still as “problems” rather than innovators.

Imagine curricula centered around life skills like problem-solving methods, project management, collaboration techniques, and systems thinking. Picture learning spaces designed around practical application rather than passive consumption, where students progress at their own pace through problems that matter to them.

What’s one skill you wish you’d learned in school that would have made your adult life easier? For most of us, that list grows longer every year. Perhaps the most valuable education is recognizing what we weren’t taught and having the curiosity to fill those gaps ourselves. This awareness, this ability to identify our own learning needs and pursue them independently, might be the most crucial meta-skill of all.

When we realize that our formal education was just the very beginning, we free ourselves from the limitations of what others decided we should know. We become active architects of our own knowledge rather than passive recipients of predetermined curricula. This shift in perspective transforms education from something that happened to us in the past to something we actively create for ourselves every day.

The true measure of learning isn’t what you were taught, but what you seek out when no one is grading you. What gap in your education are you filling today?

Every Endeavor Has Its Heisenberg Principle

In quantum mechanics, the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle states that you can’t simultaneously know both the position and momentum of a particle with absolute precision. The more you focus on one, the less you can know about the other. It’s a fundamental tension, not a flaw. Apparently, this is just the way the universe works.

This principle isn’t limited to physics. It’s woven into the fabric of almost every human endeavor. Take any pursuit, and you’ll find a version of this tension. In art, it’s the balance between spontaneity and refinement. In business, it’s innovation versus stability. In relationships, it’s freedom versus commitment. We’re always navigating these trade-offs, always making choices that lean one way or the other.

The mistake is thinking we can eliminate the tension and reach a perfect balance or a single “right” answer. I believe the truth is that the tension isn’t a problem to solve. It’s the dynamic that keeps us alive, growing, and adapting. It’s what forces us to make deliberate choices, to stay present, to see what’s really in front of us rather than what we assume or wish for.

The trick to find perfect balance is to learn to work within the pull. Sometimes you’ll lean into speed, sometimes into precision. Sometimes you’ll focus on the big picture, sometimes on the details. What matters is that you’re intentional about it, that you’re aware of the trade-offs and willing to adjust as you go.

Think of it like weightlifting. Beginners focus on lifting the weight no matter how. Experienced lifters know it’s about the tension, the controlled, deliberate effort that builds strength. This is what mastery looks like in any field: not the elimination of tension, but the ability to move fluidly within it. It’s what separates the good from the great in everything we do.

So, the next time you’re caught between two seemingly opposing forces, don’t panic. Remind yourself that the tension is the work. The tension is the work. And the more you lean into it, the better you’ll get at playing the game.

What’s one area of your life where you’re feeling this tension most acutely? What happens if you stop trying to eliminate the tension itself, and instead, start asking: For this specific moment, does this problem need speed or precision? Freedom or commitment? Spontaneity or refinement? How can you actively engage with the tension rather than avoid it?

The Twin Islands

On a forgotten archipelago, two islands sit side by side in the same open sea. From a distance, they appear identical. They have the same volcanic origin, same tropical climate, same exposure to ocean currents. Yet visitors returning from these shores tell starkly different stories.

The first island has transformed the rising tides into elaborate canal networks, powering mills and connecting communities. Its inhabitants study the sea patterns not with fear but with curiosity, adapting their structures and systems to harness what cannot be controlled. They’ve built floating gardens, developed new navigation methods, even created architectural innovations that flex with the water’s natural rhythms. When massive waves come, as they inevitably do, these communities bend without breaking.

The second island fights a constant, exhausting battle against the water. Its inhabitants build higher sea walls each year, investing enormous resources in resisting the ocean’s advance. They’ve organized their entire society around maintaining these barriers, creating rigid hierarchies and fixed systems that work perfectly, until they catastrophically don’t. When the inevitable storm breaches their defenses, recovery becomes nearly impossible.

This divergence perfectly illustrates what’s happening as AI reshapes our economy. The same technological waves are reaching every shore, every industry, profession, and business model. Yet some are experiencing unprecedented prosperity while others face submersion. The difference isn’t about which waves reach which shores. It’s about fundamentally different responses to change itself.

The widening gap between these approaches creates what economists call a “k-shaped” reality, where one segment rises dramatically while another falls at the same rate. What’s fascinating is that this division doesn’t follow traditional boundaries of industry, education, or even technological access. I’m guessing that it tracks almost perfectly with mindset, specifically, whether you see each new wave as something to resist or something to redirect.

What shoreline are you standing on today? Are you building higher walls against the technological tides, or developing systems that transform their energy into forward movement?

1

The Compass, Not the Ship

The most dangerous myth in business today is not that AI will replace humans, it’s the subtle belief that your value resides in your methods rather than your mission.

I watch entrepreneurs clutch their expertise like drowning sailors to driftwood. The Facebook ads specialist terrified by algorithmic changes. The Shopify developer threatened by no-code solutions. The content writer anxiously monitoring ChatGPT’s capabilities. Their identity has become fused with their technique, their worth determined by specific technological proficiencies that grow more precarious by the day. But what if (bear with me) they’ve been measuring themselves by entirely the wrong metric?

The solution-agnostic mindset offers liberation. It separates your purpose from your process, your destination from your vehicle. It’s a form of decommodification. Consider the wilderness guide who knows every hidden waterfall and safe passage through treacherous terrain. Their value isn’t in the particular boots they wear or even maps that they carry. It’s in their intimate knowledge of the landscape and the travelers they shepherd through it. When better equipment emerges, they simply incorporate it without existential crisis, because their core offering remains unchanged: safe, transformative journeys through territories they deeply understand.

This doesn’t mean all tools deserve equal skepticism. Certain platforms and technologies warrant long-term investment, but even then it’s not because of attachment to the tool itself, but because of carefully placed trust in its creators and ecosystem. This trust remains conditional, a measured bet on alignment of values and trajectory. The moment this trust falters, the solution-agnostic entrepreneur pivots without hesitation or nostalgia. They carry the compass, not the ship.

What conversation could you initiate today that focuses entirely on who you serve rather than how you currently serve them? The answer might reveal whether you’re truly navigating by mission or merely maintaining machinery that someone else will eventually automate.