Yakir's Blog

Rough Polish Ideas Daily

Naturally Asymmetrical Decision-Making

The neurological response to losing $10 differs quantifiably from gaining $10. This is not by subjective perception, but by measurable brain activity. Brain scans show that anticipating a loss activates our emotional centers about 2.5 times more intensely than anticipating an equivalent gain. This is beyond how we feel. It’s how our brains are built.

Think of your decision-making brain as a scale with uneven arms. The loss side is significantly longer, creating a structural imbalance that tips your choices regardless of the actual weights involved. This tilted scale explains why the fear of losing a client often drives more urgent action than the possibility of gaining a new one of equal value. When the scale tips toward loss, our normally careful analysis gets overridden by emotional circuits designed for survival, not rational calculation.

This imbalance creates predictable patterns in how we approach risk. When protecting what we have, we become extraordinarily cautious, like someone carrying a full cup of coffee across a crowded room. But when trying to recover a loss, that same person suddenly sprints, sloshing coffee everywhere, in a desperate attempt to make up lost ground. Organizations follow this same pattern without realizing it, making cautious moves during growth but surprisingly risky ones when facing decline.

To recalibrate your tilted scale, try the “third-person reframe”: When making your next significant decision, write down your options as if advising someone else. Use their name and describe their situation objectively. Notice how your risk assessment immediately becomes more balanced when you step outside your own loss-aversion circuitry. What decision are you currently viewing through the distorted lens of potential loss? Try this reframing technique today and notice how your perception of the same options shifts.

Your Expertise Can Blind You

If you’re reading this, you’ve probably had that experience of carefully explaining something you know deeply, only to be met with blank stares. There’s that moment of confusion. How could something so obvious to you be so opaque to others?

This disconnect isn’t about intelligence or attention, but rather a cognitive blind spot we all develop. Let’s call it the curse of knowledge. Once we thoroughly understand something, our brains literally cannot simulate what it’s like not to know it. The neural pathways that formed during our learning process become so efficient that we can no longer access the memory of confusion, uncertainty, and discovery that marked our own journey from ignorance to understanding.

This cognitive blindness creates a fascinating paradox: the deeper your expertise grows in any domain, the worse you often become at communicating that expertise to newcomers. The language, concepts, and connections that feel elementary to you exist in a different cognitive universe for your listener. What you consider “basic terminology” might be completely foreign territory for them. The steps you skip as “obviously implied” represent critical missing links in their understanding.

What domain knowledge do you possess that others find difficult to grasp? Try this exercise: identify three concepts you consider “fundamentally obvious” in your field and force yourself to explain them as if to someone who has absolutely no background knowledge. Notice where you want to use shorthand or specialized vocabulary, where you unconsciously make conceptual leaps. These moments of impatience reveal exactly where your expertise has constructed a communication barrier that only deliberate awareness can dismantle.

The World Doesn’t Run on Single Threads

When something fails, we instinctively search for “the reason.” When success arrives, we’re equally quick to identify “the key factor” that made everything work. This mental shorthand feels satisfying because it creates a tidy narrative that our pattern-seeking brains crave.

But reality refuses to cooperate with our desire for simplicity. The single cause fallacy, our tendency to attribute complex outcomes to one dominant factor, blinds us to the intricate web of influences that actually shape results. In business especially, this fallacy leads to dangerous oversimplifications: “Our campaign succeeded because of the creative,” or “We lost the client because our price point was too high.” These explanations feel right precisely because they’re simple, not because they’re accurate.

Think of any significant outcome as a garden rather than a single plant. Success doesn’t grow from one perfect seed but emerges from the interplay between soil quality, watering schedule, sunlight exposure, pest management, and countless environmental factors working in harmony. When we fixate on a single cause, we’re essentially staring at just the flowers while ignoring the complex ecosystem that produced them.

What systems are you currently attributing to a single cause? Can you identify three contributing factors you might be overlooking? The next time you’re tempted to explain an outcome with a single-factor analysis, pause and consider what other elements might be quietly working beneath the surface.

1

We Live In What We Think

In the quiet rooms of your mind, an architect works tirelessly.

This architect doesn’t build with concrete and steel, but with something far more fundamental: thoughts. Each thought becomes a foundation, upon which emotions rise like walls, behaviors form the roof, and experiences become the rooms we inhabit.

Consider the blueprint: A simple thought, perhaps “I don’t belong here,” lays a foundation. Almost immediately, emotions rise from this foundation, anxiety, unease, a subtle contraction in your chest. These emotions shape behaviors as naturally as walls direct movement, your voice softens, your posture changes, you find reasons to exit early. And within these structures, you live experiences that feel solid and real: another uncomfortable gathering, another confirmation of your separateness.

The most fascinating aspect of this architecture is its invisibility. We walk through these mental structures daily, feeling their effects without seeing their design. We experience the low ceilings of limitation without noticing who placed them there.

I’ve wandered through many such structures in my own mind. For years, I lived in rooms built on thoughts of inadequacy, never questioning why the ceilings always felt so low, why the windows offered such limited views. The architecture seemed permanent, immutable… until I glimpsed the blueprint.

What liberates us is the revelation that we are both the architect and the inhabitant. The thoughts we lay as foundations aren’t inevitable, they’re choices, often made unconsciously but choices nonetheless. Change the foundation, and the entire structure shifts. A thought like “I’m still learning how to connect here” creates different emotional contours, different behavioral pathways, and ultimately, different rooms to live in.

What structures are you inhabiting today? Can you sense their foundations beneath your feet? The architect awaits your instructions.

Beyond the Garden Walls

Every thought you have about yourself or others grows in one of two gardens.

The Walled Garden

Within high stone walls sits an ancient garden with rigid hedges trimmed to perfect angles and plants sorted by strict categories. The gardener here carries only shears and a measuring stick, ruthlessly cutting back anything that grows “incorrectly.” Plants either thrive exactly as expected or are removed entirely.

In this garden, thoughts can become unalterable verdicts: “This is just how I do things.” “I never get things right.” “They’re doing it wrong.” The measuring stick determines worth, and the shears enforce conformity.

The Open Garden

Just beyond those walls sprawls a different garden with gentle paths winding through diverse landscapes. Here, the gardener carries a watering can and a magnifying glass, studying how each plant responds to different conditions. Some plants that struggle in shade flourish when moved to sunlight.

In this garden, thoughts become useful observations: “This approach works better in these conditions.” “I notice a pattern worth exploring.” “They see things from a different perspective.” The magnifying glass reveals complexity, and the watering can nurtures understanding.

The Complete Landscape

Both gardens exist within you. Both have purpose. The walled garden provides structure and clear boundaries. The open garden allows for growth and adaptation.

You forget that you have access to both gardens.

When forming thoughts about yourself or others, notice which garden you’re standing in. Are you measuring against rigid standards or observing with genuine curiosity? Are you cutting away or cultivating understanding?

1

You’re Free to Abandon Who You Were

Have you ever caught yourself defending a behavior with “that’s just who I am”? It’s a phrase we use when we’re deeply attached to aspects of our identity, often without realizing how much that attachment might be limiting us.

We all develop attachments to certain identities. Maybe you’re “the responsible one,” “the creative rebel,” or “the person who never changes their mind.” These identities can feel safe and comfortable, like well-worn paths we’ve traveled a thousand times. But when we grip them too tightly, they become invisible prisons rather than authentic expressions of who we are.

I witnessed this struggle firsthand with a client who refused to adapt how she communicated with her team despite consistent feedback. “I’m just direct. That’s my style,” she insisted. Her attachment to this identity was creating friction and limiting her effectiveness, but letting go felt like a betrayal of her authentic self. What she eventually realized was that flexibility wasn’t erasing her identity, but rather it was expanding her capacity for connection and impact.

Identity isn’t fixed; it’s fluid. Recognize when attachment to “who you are” is actually holding you back from who you could become.

Is there an aspect of your identity you’re clutching so tightly that it’s preventing growth? Remember that you can honor your core values while still evolving how they’re expressed in different contexts.

2

The Luxury of Less

Have you ever watched a master chef prepare a simple tomato dish? Just three ingredients; tomatoes, salt, olive oil, transforms into something extraordinary. The restraint is what makes it brilliant. No distractions, no unnecessary flourishes. Just the essence, nothing to hide behind.

Our minds crave this same clarity. Each decision we face is like another ingredient added to our mental plate. Too many, and the dish becomes muddled, the flavors competing rather than complementing.

I think of my friend who trained at a wonderful culinary school. One evening, he prepared an elaborate seven-course meal for his family. Each plate was meticulously garnished, each sauce layered with complexity. He had poured his heart into creating what he considered his masterpiece. Yet his children barely touched the food, eventually asking for simple pasta. What he saw as devotion to craft and an expression of love, they experienced as overwhelming. Their young palates couldn’t distinguish between the twelve spices in his signature sauce; they simply felt confused by the intensity, ultimately preferring the comfort of fewer, clearer flavors.

The most profound luxury today isn’t more, it’s less. Think of the peace you feel entering a thoughtfully designed space with only essential elements. Or the clarity that comes from a conversation with someone who speaks directly rather than circling around multiple possibilities.

What might you “phase out” of your work or life today in order to create this same sense of luxurious simplicity for others?

2